Perers, B.
April 1997
Solar Energy, vol 59-4, p. 163-178
flat plate collectors, evacuated tubular collectors, CPC collectors and concentrating collectors with satisfying results. Typically the correlation coefficient R2 is better than 0.99 and the standard deviation of the difference between model and measurement is in the range 3-10 W/m2.
In the original method the angular dependence of the optical efficiency and the temperature dependence of the heat losses are supposed to be adjusted to a predetermined function. The most recent development is a routine that makes it possible to accurately identify non-linear optical and thermal performance. This extended MLR method can identify the zero loss efficiency for every angle of incidence interval and the temperature dependent heat losses for every temperature interval. This opens the application of the method to collectors with special incidence angle and heat loss effects that cannot be described easily with a combination of elementary functions. Instead a table of parameter values is determined, which is used directly in standard simulation programmes. This method will further increase the accuracy when comparing different collector designs. It has been used for comparing different glazings and for comparison with spectrophotometric measurements. It has also been used for analysing the heat loss factors for Teflon and honeycomb glazings. Since the total power output of the collector is less dependent on the heat loss coefficient than on the optical efficiency the scattering in this data is larger than for the incidence angle curves.
The reflectance of booster mirrors cannot be derived with the MLR-method with acceptable accuracy. The correlation between direct irradiance and irradiance from the reflector exhibit a very strong correlation. Instead the effective reflectance of the mirror can be estimated by comparison of the measured output with calculation by the complete collector and reflector model. This effective reflectance is not compatible with the specular reflectance obtained from spectrophotometric measurements caused by large differences in acceptance angles.
Standard multiple linear regression available in most spread sheet and statistical programs can be used for the parameter identification in the extended MLR-procedure. The identification takes only a few seconds. At the Älvkarleby Laboratory the test method is now used as a routine tool for the evaluation of new collector materials and designs. The Swedish National testing institute has evaluated the methods with the conclusion that they have a potential for being used in standardised collector testing.
Source: www.sciencedirect.com