[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Type56, small timestep
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 17:58:57 -0600
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 17:58:15 -0600
- From: Michaël Kummert <kummert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Type56, small timestep
I forgot to mention that the Type 56 time base MUST be an integer multiple
of the TRNSYS time step.
0.05 and 1h would work, but not 0.15 and 1.
Michaël
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-trnsys@relay.doit.wisc.edu
> [mailto:owner-trnsys@relay.doit.wisc.edu] On Behalf Of Michaël Kummert
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 17:50
> To: trnsys@relay.doit.wisc.edu
> Subject: RE: Type56, small timestep
>
>
> Timo,
>
> The TRNSYS time step can be less than or equal to the Type 56
> wall time base. In your case, you can for example use a 3-min
> (0.05h) time step for the Trnsys simulation and a 1 hour time
> base for the wall transfer functions.
>
> Please note that the starting time of the simulation MUST be
> a multiple of the Type 56 Time base. You cannot start the
> simulation at 0.05h, for example.
>
> If you use hourly weather data file, the right start time for
> a yearly simulation is ALWAYS 1 for any time step (whether or
> not you use Type 56).
>
> Regards,
>
> Michaël Kummert
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> Michaël Kummert
>
> Solar Energy Laboratory - University of Wisconsin-Madison
> 1303 Engr Res Bldg, 1500 Engineering Drive
> Madison, WI 53706
>
> Tel: +1 (608) 263-1589
> Fax: +1 (608) 262-8464
> E-mail: kummert@engr.wisc.edu (*****NEW*****)
>
> SEL Web Site: http://sel.me.wisc.edu
> TRNSYS Web Site: http://sel.me.wisc.edu/trnsys
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-trnsys@relay.doit.wisc.edu
> > [mailto:owner-trnsys@relay.doit.wisc.edu] On Behalf Of Timo
> Sengewald
> > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 03:45
> > To: TRNSYS group
> > Subject: Type56, small timestep
> >
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I want to run a simulation of a solar system with a
> > timestep=1min. The system itself works well. But now the
> > problem is to include the belonging building (Type 56) at
> > this timestep. It is necessary to use a timestep less than
> > 10min to examine the dynamic behavior of the whole system
> > depending on the insolation.
> >
> > Does anybody have a solution?
> > Thank you!
> >
> >
> > Timo Sengewald
> > ------------------------------------------
> > Phönix Sonnenwärme AG
> > Am Treptower Park 28-30
> > D-12435 Berlin, Germany
> > e-mail: timo.sengewald@sonnenwaerme-ag.de
> > www.sonnenwaerme.ag
> > Tel.: +49-(0)30-53 00 07-237
> > Fax.: +49-(0)30-53 00 07-17
> > ------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
>