[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: problems with type 160
Dear Torsten,
suppose I want to be in case 1.
Then in zone 1 the slab should be defined as a boundary wall with
temperature and convection coefficient linked with type 160.
But what should it be in zone 2?
Another boundary wall linked with the same type 160?
Or an adjacent wall with backside facing zone 1?
Thanks again
Adriana
as a At 14.08 16/09/03 +0200, you wrote:
Dear
Adriana,
there are 2 posibilities
1) you simulate the room on the
other side of the slab cooling and link the backside temperature to the
surface
temperature of the ceiling for
that room.
2) if the conditions in the
adjacend room are the same you can link it to the ceiling ofthe same
room.
Torsten
Mailto:Hotline@transsolar.com;
http://www.transsolar.com
- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
- Von: Adriana Angelotti [mailto:Adriana.Angelotti@polimi.it]
- Gesendet: Montag, 15. September 2003 18:58
- An: trnsys@relay.doit.wisc.edu
- Betreff: problems with type 160
- Dear trnsys users,
- is there anybody experienced with type 160 "Floor heating and Hypocaust"?
- I'm trying to use it with type 56 using trnsys 14.2 but I get strange results,
- probably I don't link it the right way.
- I defined the radiant ceiling as a BOUNDARY wall with an internal temperature
- and a convective coefficient calculated by type 160.
- But what about the back side temperature and convective coefficient?
- Thank you in advance for any help or example.
- Adriana Angelotti
- Adriana Angelotti
- PhD student
- eErg end-use Efficiency Research Group
- Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Energetica
- Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32
- 20133 Milano
- Italy
- ph +39.02.2399.3859
- fax +39.02.2399.3940